Politics Saturday, October 17th, 2009

SNTF: Municipal Election Voter Turnout

Another of the hard data tables which provides a snapshot of the current health of London’s neighbourhoods.

This table shows the % of Eligible Voters who Voted in Municipal Election, something that we believe contributes to 2 of the 14 elements that have been identified by the Resident Task Force as being important for a strong neighbourhood:

  • have people that are active (participate in their neighbourhood)
  • have people that are empowered (are engaged and know how to effect change and are supported by City government)

17 neighbourhoods are below the city average of 40% and 12 neighbourhoods are above it.

Stoneybrook 53
Oakridge 52
Riverbend 49
Byron 48
Lambeth 48
Uplands 47
Hyde Park 44
Fanshawe 42
Sunningdale 42
Jackson 41
North London 41
Talbot 41
Highland 40
Westmount 40
South London 39
Southcrest 39
Hamilton Road 38
Stoney Creek 38
Westminister 38
West London 37
Huron Heights 36
Carling 35
Glen Cairn 35
Masonville 35
Medway 35
East London 34
White Oaks 33
Argyle 32
Central 30
Fox Hollow
  • 4 Comments
  • Politics

4 Responses to “SNTF: Municipal Election Voter Turnout”

  • Justin says:

    Do you have a map showing where each of these neighbourhoods is. I know most of them but want some clarification. Thanks

  • Justin says:

    Thanks Greg!

    Interesting to see where voter turnout is low and kind of alarming and frustrating. A few Tweeters should have a look at this to see that I’m not just blowing smoke (in backrooms) when I suggest that youth and tenants unfortunately don’t vote. Though I’m only going from assumption and not a deep study of the demographics of each neighbourhood (which are all quite diverse by London standards.)

    Central London is the lowest (not a very good sign at all) South London not much higher and still below the City average. The neighbourhoods above the average are the wealthy suburban neighbourhoods. One might argue that this is because there’s no one to vote for but from my scant knowledge of the last election, I don’t think that’s really the case either. Councillor Bryant had some stiff competition and yet her ward had very low turnout – no doubt lots of students play a role here.

    Anyway. Thanks for the link!

    • Greg Fowler says:

      Although I found the data tables to be extremely helpful, some care has to be taken with them. With respect to voter turnout, I made the point to the task force that some neighbourhoods have “pockets” that can be quite different from the rest. There are some polls in Ward 1 where the turnout was in single digits, and to me, that’s a cry for help. It tells me that there’s something seriously wrong that demands more attention than what’s being done more generally on a neighbourhood-wide basis.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

  • 4 Comments

Enjoy this article?

Why not buy us a drink and support From My Bottom Step!
(Click here to donate via Paypal!)

Contribute! Write for FMBS!

Interested in contributing to FMBS?
Find out how you can be a guest writer.